What errors in filling out an invoice are not critical for VAT deduction?

If he does not do this, the buyer will lose the right to deduct VAT.

An invoice is a document that serves as the basis for accepting the VAT amount for deduction. According to paragraph 3 of Article 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation, an invoice is issued:

  • taxpayers for transactions carried out in relation to the object of taxation (Article 146 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation);
  • persons exempt from VAT under Articles 145 and 145.1 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation (clause 5 of Article 168 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation);
  • tax agents for purchases on the territory of Russia from foreign suppliers (subclauses 1 and 2 of Article 161 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation) or when using state property (clause 3 of Article 161 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation);
  • VAT payers on received advances and when changing the price or volume of shipments already made (clause 3 of Article 168 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation);
  • non-payers of VAT when selling on their own behalf or when re-issuing invoices (subclauses 1 and 3.1 of Article 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation).

The established forms of the invoice form and the procedure for filling it out are contained in Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 26, 2011 No. 1137 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules).

The information required to fill out an invoice consists of a certain set of indicators (subclauses 5, 5.1, 5.2 of Article 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation):

  • details (number and date);
  • information about the seller and buyer;
  • the currency in which the numerical data of the document is reflected;
  • unambiguous name of the object of sale;
  • the total sale price without taxes and with taxes, the amount of taxes, the VAT rate, if there is a tax;
  • signatures of persons entrusted with this right.

Significant errors in the invoice

An invoice in which (clause 2 of Article 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation) is completely unsuitable for deduction:

  • there is no information about individuals or this information is fundamentally incorrect;
  • it is impossible to unambiguously determine the object of sale;
  • the sales price, rate and amount of tax are missing or given with errors (see, for example, the letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated April 19, 2017);
  • the currency is missing or incorrectly indicated (see letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated March 11, 2012 No. 03-07-08/68).

These defects prevent a reliable determination of the basic data included in the invoice. Therefore, tax deduction based on documents with such errors is impossible.

This means that if in the invoice the cost of the purchased goods and, accordingly, the amount of VAT are indicated incorrectly (including with arithmetic and technical errors) or their indicators are missing, then a deduction on such an invoice is not provided.

note

Some courts (see Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service No. F03-2116/2014 of June 10, 2014 in case No. A51-17093/2013) believe that the signing of invoices by unidentified persons is an independent basis for refusing to accept VAT tax deductions. However, there are also opposing court decisions in which the arbitrators recognized the signing of invoices by an unidentified and unauthorized person as an insignificant circumstance (see Resolution of the AS SKO dated June 11, 2015 No. F08-3452/2015 in case No. A32-26952/2012).

Minor errors in the invoice

Some errors in the invoice are not grounds for denial of the VAT deduction highlighted in this document. These are errors that do not prevent inspectors from identifying during a tax audit (Clause 2 of Article 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation):

  • seller, buyer of goods (works, services), property rights;
  • name of goods (works, services), property rights;
  • their cost;
  • tax rate;
  • the amount of VAT charged to the buyer.

Such “non-critical” defects include, in particular, the date the invoice was issued by the seller, as well as obvious typos in information about the supplier and buyer, the absence of a number, the inclusion of additional details in the invoice, etc.

Thus, with regard to such details as the address, officials are not very strict. It can be written in the invoice with abbreviations (partly in capital letters and partly in small letters), since such address abbreviations are not prohibited in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (see letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated October 11, 2017 No. 03-07-09/66329).

If the address of the seller and buyer from the register does not indicate a country, the seller can independently add the words “Russian Federation”, “Russia” or “RF” to the address.

Also, if the words “district”, “street”, “house” are not written in the address, or the words “city” and “street” are written in abbreviated form, this will not be considered an error due to which the tax office will refuse to deduct VAT. The deduction of VAT is also not prohibited when replacing the word “premises” with the word “office”.

As for such details as checkpoint, it, unlike the TIN, which is indicated here, is not among the mandatory invoice details listed in paragraph 5 of Article 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation.

That is, these are defects that will not lead to denial of deduction.

Errors in buyer details

To avoid any doubt about the identification of the buyer who will accept the amount of “input” tax for deduction, information about him must be correctly indicated in the invoice. We are talking about the following details: name (line 6); address (line 6a); taxpayer identification number (line 6b).

Let us remember the rules by which these details are filled out.

On line 6 indicate the full or abbreviated name of the buyer in accordance with the constituent documents.

If the goods are supplied to separate divisions of buyers, then line 6 indicates the name of the parent organization (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated May 4, 2016 No. 03-07-09/25719).

Minor typos (capital letters instead of lowercase letters and vice versa, extra dashes, commas, etc.), which do not interfere with the identification of the buyer, are not grounds for refusal to deduct (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated May 2, 2012 No. 03-07-11/130).

But if, instead of the name of the organization, the full name of the employee is indicated, the buyer is deprived of the right to deduction (letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated January 9, 2017 No. SD-4-3 / [email protected] ).

The location of the buyer is indicated on line 6a in accordance with the constituent documents.

If the invoice indicates an outdated legal address of the buyer, the right to deduction is retained (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated 08.08.2014 No. 03-07-09/39449). The actual address, which differs from the legal address, can be indicated additionally (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated December 21, 2017 No. 03-07-09/85517).

Abbreviations, replacing capital letters with lowercase letters, and rearranging words in street names are minor changes. They do not prevent deductions (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated January 17, 2018 No. 03-07-09/1846).

If the goods are supplied to separate divisions of buyers, then line 6a indicates the location of the parent organization (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated May 4, 2016 No. 03-07-09/25719).

If the goods are delivered to separate divisions of the buyer, then in line 6b you must indicate the TIN of the parent organization and the checkpoint of the division (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated May 4, 2016 No. 03-07-09/25719).

If the buyer's TIN and KPP are indicated incorrectly or not indicated at all, tax authorities will try to deprive the buyer of the right to deduction.

The courts have a different opinion. The buyer’s right to deduction is retained, since the buyer’s TIN is known to the tax authorities (Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated September 28, 2010 No. KA-A40/11365-10), and the checkpoint is not a mandatory requisite mentioned in paragraph 5 of Art. 169 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation (Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated February 27, 2010 No. KA-A40/1164-10).

Product cost and VAT amount

Tax authorities will typically deny a deduction if there are arithmetic errors on the invoice. In particular, when the quantity of goods (work, services) multiplied by the price is not equal to the cost of goods (work, services) without VAT. Another example is that the cost without VAT multiplied by the rate does not equal the tax amount. Moreover, even if there is an inaccuracy in one or two lines, inspectors will cancel the deduction for the entire invoice.

However, arbitration courts do not share this position of inspectors. In particular, the company defended the right not to pay a fine by providing the court with a duplicate invoice with the same number and from the same date, but with the correct value of the cost of goods (work, services) and tax (resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the West Siberian District dated September 30, 2010 No. A46-25870/2009).

Another company proved that arithmetic errors were related to features of the supplier's accounting software. It was set up in such a way that when filling out an invoice, the total cost of the entire delivery without VAT was divided by the quantity, and the result was multiplied by the rate. Since the cost per unit of goods was very small, such an algorithm led to rounding errors. The judges considered that minor inaccuracies do not deprive the buyer of the right to a deduction (Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the North-Western District dated January 19, 2012 No. F07-536/11).

Invoice: adjustment or corrected?

If there are significant errors in the original invoice, a corrected document is drawn up. Significant errors prevent the buyer from exercising the right to deduct “input” VAT.

If the error is not recognized as such, changes may not be made to the invoice (clause 7 of the Rules).

Let us remind you that an adjustment invoice is issued when the cost of goods already shipped, work performed, services rendered, or transferred property rights is changed. A price change is possible if:

  • after the goods are shipped, their price is changed;
  • specify the quantity of goods shipped.

In addition, before issuing an adjustment invoice, the seller must:

  • notify the buyer of changes in the cost of shipped goods;
  • receive from the buyer a document as a fact of notification of a change in the terms of the transaction, confirming his consent. This could be a contract, agreement or any primary document.

As a rule, in the event of a technical error, such documents are not issued. And since the supplier will not have a single document confirming the change in the price of the goods, he cannot issue an adjustment document. He will have to issue a corrected invoice.

critical

See what “critical” is in other dictionaries:

  • critical - intense, dramatic, disapproving, negative, unflattering, dramatic Dictionary of Russian synonyms. critically adverb, number of synonyms: 7 • dramatically (6) • ... Dictionary of synonyms
  • Critical - I adv. qualities 1. Based on criticism. 2. Criticizing. II predic. An evaluative characteristic of something, a statement, judgment, etc. as containing criticism or self-criticism. Explanatory... ...Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language by Efremova
  • critical - Adj. to critical I ... Ukrainian Tlumachny Dictionary
  • critical - adjective unchangeable word unit ... Spelling dictionary of Ukrainian language
  • critical - critically... Spelling difficult adverbs
  • I will look at it critically - verb. critics, analyzers, prevaluators... Riverman is synonymous with Bulgarian
  • Mironin - Mironin, Sigismund Sigismundovich Sigismund Sigismundovich Mironin pseudonym Birth name: the person does not reveal his real name Occupation: publicist Date of birth ... Wikipedia
  • Mountain sickness - I Mountain sickness (morbus montanus) is a pathological condition that develops in people due to low partial pressure of atmospheric gases, mainly oxygen, in high altitude conditions. There are acute, subacute and chronic forms of G. b ... Medical encyclopedia
  • CRITICAL - CRITICAL, critical, critical; critical, critical, critical (book). Same as critical in 2 digits. He was not critical enough (adv.) to the statistical material. Ushakov's explanatory dictionary. D.N. Ushakov. 1935 1940 ... Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary
  • Critically - adv. qualities 1. Based on criticism; critical I 1.. 2. Criticizing; critical I 2.. Explanatory Dictionary by Efremova. T. F. Efremova. 2000 ... Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language by Efremova

Can I get a deduction on a corrected invoice?

In the corrected invoice, which the seller draws up in case of detection of significant errors, indicate the serial number and date of the invoice drawn up before the correction was made to it (clause 1, 7 of the Rules).

Therefore, the corrected invoice must be prepared using the form in effect on the date of the original invoice.

The corrected invoice drawn up by the seller upon discovery of a significant error and issued to the buyer must be registered in the sales book in the manner prescribed by paragraph 11 of the Rules.

Thus, the Ministry of Finance of Russia has once again confirmed its position: those errors in invoices that do not prevent tax authorities from identifying the seller of goods (works, services, property rights) are not grounds for refusal to deduct VAT (clause 2 of Article 169 Tax Code of the Russian Federation).

Expert “NA” S.M. Lvovsky

conclusions

So, it can be stated that there are two trends in VAT legislation: on the one hand, loyalty to minor errors in invoices, on the other hand, the prevention of fictitious transactions aimed only at obtaining tax deductions and refunds. This is reflected both in the explanations of the fiscal authorities and in the practice of arbitration courts.

Thus, if, based on the results of an audit, a company was assessed additional VAT, penalties and a fine was issued on formal grounds, you can safely seek protection in arbitration. Of course, under one condition - the organization is not a fly-by-night company and conscientiously fulfills its responsibilities to partners and the budget. And the “violations” discovered by tax officials are nothing more than annoying oversights made without the intent to obtain an unjustified tax benefit.

Rating
( 2 ratings, average 5 out of 5 )
Did you like the article? Share with friends:
For any suggestions regarding the site: [email protected]
Для любых предложений по сайту: [email protected]